Mortgage Lenders Nationwide

A recent article from the Mortgage Bankers Association reported that home loan applications declined this week in response to the increase of mortgage rates last week.  The volume of home loan applications declined 3.5% compared with the previous week.  Loan applications filed were still up an unadjusted 16.1% for the week ended Aug. 7 from the same week in 2008, according to the MBA’s weekly survey.  FHA mortgage applications filed last week to purchase homes rose 1.1% from the week before. Volumes for conforming, VA and FHA home loan applications were all lower than expected.

Mortgage refinancing applications to refinance existing mortgages decreased 7.2%, on a week-to-week basis, reversing the 7.2% increase during the week ended July 31, according to the Washington-based MBA. The four-week moving average for all mortgages was down 0.7%. Home refinancing applications made up 52.3% of all applications last week, down from 54.2% the previous week. ARM mortgage loans accounted for 5.8%, up from 5.4%.

According to the MBA survey, thirty-year fixed-rate mortgage loans carried an average interest rate last week of 5.38%, up from 5.17% the week before. As for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, the average rose to 4.71% last week, up from 4.60% the week before. And 1-year ARMs averaged 6.71% last week, up from 6.67% the week before. Read the complete article online> Mortgage Loan Application Activity Slowing

Recent government initiatives to stem the nation’s looming home foreclosures are hampered because banks and other mortgage lenders in many cases have more financial incentive to let homeowners lose their property in  aforeclosure than to work out a loan modification agreement, some economists have concluded.   Policymakers often say it’s a good deal for home loan lenders to cut borrowers a break on mortgage payments to keep them in their homes. But, according to researchers and industry experts, foreclosing can be more profitable.   The problem is that loan modifications is profitable to banks for only one set of distressed borrowers, while home loan lenders are actually dealing with three very different types. Loan modification plans make economic sense for a bank or other lender only if the borrower can’t sustain payments without it yet will be able to keep up with new, more modest terms. A second set are those who are likely to fall behind on their home loan payments again even after receiving a loan workout and are likely to lose their homes one way or another. Mortgage lenders don’t want to help these borrowers because waiting to foreclose can be costly. 

Finally, there are those delinquent borrowers who can somehow, even at great sacrifice, catch up without a modification. Lenders have little financial incentive to help them.   These financial calculations on the part of lenders pose a difficult challenge for President Obama’s ambitious efforts to address the mortgage crisis, which remains at the heart of the country’s economic troubles and continues to upend millions of lives. Senior officials at the Treasury Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development have summoned industry executives to a meeting Tuesday to discuss how to step up the pace of loan relief. FHA has already added a new mortgage loan modification alternative to the traditional FHA refinance loans, for borrowers whose mortgages are greater than the value of their property.  The administration is seeking to influence lenders’ calculus in part by offering them billions of dollars in incentives to restructure mortgages and home loans. Still, foreclosed homes continue to flood the market, forcing down home prices. That contributed to the unexpectedly large jump in new-home sales in June, reported yesterday by the Commerce Department.   “There has been this policy push to use modifications as the tool of choice,” said Michael Fratantoni, vice president of single-family-home research at the Mortgage Bankers Association. But “there is going to be this narrow slice of borrowers for which modifications is the right answer.” The size of that slice is tough to discern, he said. “The industry and policymakers have been grappling with that.”   The effort to understand the dynamics of the mortgage business comes as the administration is begging lending companies to extend additional mortgage refinancing to help borrowers under its Making Home Affordable plan, which gives lenders subsidies to lower the payments for distressed borrowers. According to RealtyTrac about 200,000 homeowners have received modified loans since the program launched in March, while more than 1.5 million borrowers were subject during the first half of the year to some form of foreclosure filings, from default notices to completed foreclosure sales.

No doubt part of the explanation is that lenders are overwhelmed by the volume of borrowers seeking to modify their mortgages. Rising unemployment and falling home prices have added to the problem.   But a study released last month by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston was downbeat on the prospects for widespread modifications. The analysis, which looked at the performance of loans in 2007 and 2008, found that lenders lowered the monthly payments of only 3 % of delinquent borrowers, those who had missed at least two payments. Lenders tried to avoid modifying the loans of borrowers who could “self-cure,” or catch up on their payments without help, and those who would fall behind again even after receiving help, the study found.   “If the presence of self-cure risk and re-default risk do make renegotiation less appealing to investors, the number of easily ‘preventable’ foreclosures may be far less than many commentators believe,” the report said.

Nearly a third of the borrowers who miss 2 payments are able to self-cure without help from their home loan lender, according to the Boston Fed study. Separately, Moody’s Economy.com, a research firm, estimated that about a fifth of those who miss three payments will self-cure.

When Adrian Jones fell behind on the mortgage payments for her Dallas home earlier this year, her lender asked her to cut other expenses. Jones said she eliminated movies and coffee breaks. She turned to family members for loans. When that failed to raise enough, she sold her second car.   “It hurt, but it also made sense. The debt was my responsibility,” Jones said.   But six months later, after catching up on the mortgage, Jones is again feeling pinched after her hours as an office assistant at an architecture firm were cut. This time, she’s not sure she can fix the problem herself.   “I am going to try, obviously,” she said. “But it is getting harder and harder.”   Like Jones, those who are most determined to meet their obligations are often unlikely candidates for loan modifications.   “These are the people who will get a second job, borrow from their family to keep up,”

Mortgage lenders also worry that borrowers may re-default even after receiving a home loan modification. This only delays foreclosure, which can be costly to the lender because housing prices are falling throughout the country and the home’s condition may deteriorate if the owner isn’t maintaining it. In some cases, lenders lose twice as much foreclosing on a home as they did two years ago, said Laurie Goodman, senior managing director at Amherst Securities.  

American Home Mortgage Services, based in Texas, was willing to modify Edward Partain’s mortgage on his Tennessee home last April after business at his beauty salon slowed and a divorce stretched his budget. But after months of negotiating with his lender, Partain said he was surprised to learn that it would only lower his payments by $90 a month, instead of the $250 decrease he expected.   “At $250, I would have had a chance, but after they added in late fees and payments, I couldn’t do it,” he said.   Partain soon fell behind on his payments again and went back to American Home Mortgage Services seeking a more affordable payment. Partain said he was told that he was ineligible for another modification because it had been less than a year since his last. A foreclosure sale was scheduled for late July. After American Home Mortgage Services was contacted by The Washington Post about the case, the company said Partain would be considered for the federal foreclosure-prevention program and it delayed the sale by three months. Partain is relieved but anxious about the details. “You want to wait and see what figures they come up with,” he said.   Administration officials have not said publicly how many borrowers they expect to re-default under Obama’s program.   But the experience of a separate program run by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. could be instructive. After taking over the failed bank IndyMac last year, the FDIC began modifying troubled mortgages held or serviced by the company. Richard Brown, the FDIC’s chief economist, said the agency expects up to 40 % of those borrowers to re-default.   Even at that rate, he said, the modification program is more profitable than doing nothing. “The idea that 30 to 40 % re-default is a failure to a program is false,” Brown said.

The Mortgage Bankers Association announced that the mortgage refinance gauge decreased to 1,482.2, the lowest reading since November, from 2,116.3 the previous week. The home purchase index fell to 267.7 last week from a two-month high of 280.3.  Unemployment, which touched a 26-year high in May, and rising borrowing costs discouraged homeowners from refinancing, while a growing number of home foreclosures sidelined potential buyers waiting for house prices to stop declining.

The share of home loan applicants seeking to refinance loans plunged to 46.4% of total applications last week from 54%.  The average interest rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage loan fell to 5.34% from 5.44% the prior week. The rate reached 4.61% at the end of March, the lowest level since the group’s records began in 1990.  At the current thirty-year mortgage rate, monthly borrowing costs for each $100,000 of a loan would be $558, or about $62 less than the same week a year earlier, when the rate was 6.33%.  Many loan officers have voiced their concern that market needs to keep conforming and FHA mortgage rates low until the housing sector can recover.

Do You Qualify for the hottest mortgage loan, HARP?

FHA refinance loans aren’t always attainable for self-employed borrowers looking for fixed rate refinancing, because HUD requires full income documentation.  Loan modification plans can be nearly impossible for borrowers in high cost regions like California, New York and Florida who have jumbo mortgage loans.  Mortgage relief is often easier said than done.

When the stimulus package passed, millions of homeowners felt they were dissed. While the new mortgage relief program focuses on homeowners in foreclosure, it offers nothing for the homeowner who is responsible and current with their home loan payment. To compensate for this oversight, the U.S. Department of Treasury recently launched the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP). “HARP was created specifically to provide access to reduced-cost home refinancing for responsible homeowners with no equity in their home. Millions of Americans have lost their home equity due to the decline in home prices,” said Joe Engle, president of Loan Smart, Inc. in Thousand Oaks, California.

Presently, millions of homeowners find themselves in the unsettling predicament of having to sit on high mortgage interest rates that are not affordable or about to rest to a higher payment that will tip the budget negatively.  Most good borrowers are unable to refinance their homes and take advantage of historically low interest rates, because of the declining home values.  

Through the Home Affordable Refinance Program 4 to 5 million responsible homeowners will have the opportunity to refinance their homes, even if they owe more than 80% of their property’s value. “With low fixed rate mortgage refinancing, many families could see a reduction in their mortgage payments by thousands of dollars per year,” said Engle. Unfortunately, not everyone qualifies for Home Affordable Refinance Programs. This refinance program only benefits homeowners with home mortgages owned or guaranteed by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, which are Government Sponsored Enterprises. “At Loan Smart, we can assist homeowners with determining if they qualify for HARP by researching to find out if their loan is owned by either Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae,” commented Engle.   Engle points out that HARP will offer a huge advantage to homeowners with first and second mortgages. HARP will allow for refinancing of the first mortgage up to 105% of the current home value, with the second mortgage remaining in place.

In a recent NAR survey of Realtors, the report indicated that 85% home buyers appeared to be disinterested in the higher-end real estate market because they can’t get jumbo mortgages or didn’t want to pay higher mortgage interest rates.  Although NAR’s re Regulators said the stress tests showed 10 of the nation’s 19 largest banks needed to raise $74.6 billion in capital between them. The banks regulators said must raise the largest sums — Bank of America ($33.9 billion), Wells Fargo ($13.7 billion) and GMAC ($11.5 billion) — are big players in mortgage lending.

In general, the need to raise capital can constrict new home mortgage lending, because new home loans create additional capital requirements. Regulators base mortgage lenders’ capital requirements, in part, on the dollar amount of mortgage loans outstanding, and projected losses on those home loans and other investments. The results of the stress tests shouldn’t have any impact on conforming mortgages, because lenders can sell the loans they originate to Fannie and Freddie, said Tom Kelly, a spokesman for Chase, the consumer and commercial lending business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Kelly said conforming home loans have made up more than 90 % of Chase’s originations in recent months.   “In terms of whether to do more jumbos or not, it’s a decision about pricing, risk and whether holding jumbo mortgages on your balance sheet is the best use of your capital,” Kelly said. “The secondary market for jumbo mortgage loans has not returned at all, so each individual bank has to decide, one, do they have the capital, and two, do you want to use that capital?”

The number of mortgage loan applications filed nationally rose last week compared with a year ago, according to a report today from the Mortgage Bankers Association. In the week ended December 5th, the trade group’s seasonally adjusted Market Composite Index – a measure of overall mortgage loan application volume – was 796.8 points. That represented a decline of 7% from the 857.7 points of the week ended November. 28th, but an increase of 99.90% from the eight-year low of the week ended November 15 and a year-over-year increase of 2.2%.

The Refinance Index dipped 0.9% last week to 3,767.3 points, after surging 203.3% Thanksgiving week and falling 2.1% the week ended Nov. 21. Mortgage refinancing was the goal of nearly three-quarters of loan applications last week – 73.7% – up from 69.1% in the week ended Nov. 28 and 49.3% in the week ended Nov. 21, the MBA said.   The share of mortgage applicants who were seeking adjustable-rate mortgage loans (ARMs) – rather than conventional fixed-rate home loans – fell to 1.1% last week from 1.4% Thanksgiving week and 3.0 % of applications filed in the week ended November 21st.  

The average contract interest rate for a thirty-year, fixed-rate mortgage dipped to 5.45% last week from the previous week’s from 5.4 %, while the contract interest rate on a fifteen-year, fixed-rate mortgage loan declined to 5.09% from the previous 5.13%. But the average contract rate on a one-year ARM rose to 6.76% from the preceding week’s 6.61% average.   Still, by historical standards, “mortgage applications for purchases remain subdued,” Anna Piretti, a senior economist at BNP Paribas in New York, told Bloomberg News. And, she added, “tighter credit standards suggest actual mortgage lending remains constrained, weighing on sales.”

The Mortgage Bankers Association is a trade group representing the real estate finance industry. Its 3,000 member companies include mortgage firms, commercial banks, thrifts, life insurance companies and others. Additional information, including the MBA’s Weekly Application Survey, is available at www.MortgageBankers.org.

Another shocking day of financial drama in remains unsettled with increased confusion regarding the $700 billion bailout to save the nation’s financial system has any chance of making it through Congress. Meanwhile, lawmakers received another sign of the volatility of the U.S. financial system last night as federal regulators seized Washington Mutual and immediately sold the bulk of its operations to JP Morgan Chase in what amounted to the largest bank failure in U.S. history.  WAMU is one of the nations’ largest mortgage lenders, but with foreclosure crisis worsening, the home loan defaults clearly took their toll on this financial giant.  How it affects the WAMU customers and borrowers no one knows yet.  Lending guidelines continue to get stricter so bad credit mortgage refinancing becomes even more difficult.

Today no one knows whether the breakdown in negotiations means the plan is doomed or if it just represents a brief stumbling block. The Los Angeles Times reports that, far away from the limelight, Republican and Democratic lawmakers were moving toward a compromise, “but it remained to be seen whether there would be enough votes to pass legislation.” If that sounds familiar it’s because that’s how things looked yesterday in the early afternoon when key lawmakers said they were well on their way to agreeing on the “fundamentals” of a deal. But then in the White House, a “verbal brawl” broke out in the Cabinet Room, according to the New York Times, and things quickly fell apart, which led to an eloquent declaration from President Bush: “If money isn’t loosened up, this sucker could go down.” 

Apparently George Bush’s well delivered speech warning of financial pitfalls were not enough to save the plan after more quarreling heated up over “financial concerns, presidential politics and partisan rancor” resulted in “an unexpected Washington drama with the nation’s economic future hanging in the balance,” says USA Today. Who’s to blame for the breakdown? The Washington Post declared yesterday that a “renegade bloc of Republicans” managed to both surprise and anger administration officials as well as congressional leaders when they “moved to reshape” the bailout. The Wall Street Journal reports that talks are set to resume this morning “without House Republicans.” For the latest up to the minute home financing news, check out Mortgage News.