Mortgage Lenders Nationwide

Lender News, VA, FHA, Jumbo & Conforming Mortgage Rates, Lending Tips & Intelligent Financing Dialog between Home Loan Professionals & Consumers

May 18, 2009

Home Buyers Leaving Housing Market because of High Jumbo Mortgage Rates

In a recent NAR survey of Realtors, the report indicated that 85% home buyers appeared to be disinterested in the higher-end real estate market because they can’t get jumbo mortgages or didn’t want to pay higher mortgage interest rates.  Although NAR’s re Regulators said the stress tests showed 10 of the nation’s 19 largest banks needed to raise $74.6 billion in capital between them. The banks regulators said must raise the largest sums — Bank of America ($33.9 billion), Wells Fargo ($13.7 billion) and GMAC ($11.5 billion) — are big players in mortgage lending.

In general, the need to raise capital can constrict new home mortgage lending, because new home loans create additional capital requirements. Regulators base mortgage lenders’ capital requirements, in part, on the dollar amount of mortgage loans outstanding, and projected losses on those home loans and other investments. The results of the stress tests shouldn’t have any impact on conforming mortgages, because lenders can sell the loans they originate to Fannie and Freddie, said Tom Kelly, a spokesman for Chase, the consumer and commercial lending business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Kelly said conforming home loans have made up more than 90 % of Chase’s originations in recent months.   “In terms of whether to do more jumbos or not, it’s a decision about pricing, risk and whether holding jumbo mortgages on your balance sheet is the best use of your capital,” Kelly said. “The secondary market for jumbo mortgage loans has not returned at all, so each individual bank has to decide, one, do they have the capital, and two, do you want to use that capital?”

Share

April 13, 2009

Is Mortgage Relief Melting with Loan Mod Scams

For months, thousands of homeowners have been awaiting Barrack Obama’s new administration because of the promised “Hope” and lengthy discussions regarding foreclosure prevention and mortgage relief.  Of course their have been distressed homeowners who have reported better loan payments, but most are growing frustrated in a long line of borrowers awaiting a loan modification or a foreclosure.  Foreclosure scams and fraudulent loan modification programs have been reported in an alarming fashion.

The new federal program to let people refinance or renegotiate their home loans is expected to help millions of Americans lower monthly payments and avoid foreclosure. So what strings are attached?  Some homeowners have expressed concerns about the impact to their credit report or the tax implications from a short sale or loan modification. Other struggling borrowers who are still paying low teaser mortgage rates might fear their monthly mortgage payment skyrocketing.  Here are some questions and answers on concerns homeowners might have about the Making Home Affordable program.

QUESTION- How will my credit report and score be affected?

ANSWER- According to Norm Magnuson of the Consumer Data Industry Association, a trade group based in Washington.  In most cases, mortgage refinancing does not affect your score since it’s simply a rewritten mortgage, this is especially true of home refinance under a federal program like FHA since one of the terms of eligibility is that homeowners can’t have missed a payment in the past year.  It is still unclear what impact a federal mortgage modification an adjustment to terms of an existing home loan, rather than a new one — will have on credit profiles, however, Magnuson said. Regulators haven’t yet determined how the loan modifications will be reported, if at all.

If you are considering submitting a new application for a loan workout or modification under Making Home Affordable, it means you’ve already missed payments and hurt your credit profile. A loan modification should improve your credit profile in the long-run since the idea is to get you on track for meeting payments.  It might also free up money to pay off other debts.  Credit repair has been increasing in popularity and this may be one of the factors.

QUESTION- Is it possible my payments will be higher?

ANSWER- If you’re still paying a low, introductory rate, it’s possible your monthly mortgage payment will increase slightly under the federal refinancing program. But the idea is to avoid the big interest rate spikes that typically come with variable rate mortgage loan.  After submitting a request for the Making Home Affordable program, your current mortgage lender should give you a “good faith estimate” that includes your new interest rate, mortgage payment and the total cost of the loan. Compare the numbers with your current loan; you might decide that refinancing isn’t an improvement.  You can also check out the payment reduction estimator on the government’s Web site at http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov.

QUESTION- Should I wait to see if mortgage interest rates come down in a couple of months before applying?

ANSWER- Probably not, since mortgage rates are at historic lows.  Last week, rates on thirty-year mortgage loans inched upward to nearly 4.9%, but that’s still close to the lowest level since the Great Depression.  Ken Inadomi, director of the New York Mortgage Coalition said, “Waiting for mortgage rates to drop further would be irresponsible and could backfire.” Even low intro mortgage rates should not be that much lower than fixed interest rates these days and in some cases, they may even be higher. So it’s probably in your best interest to lock in now to a low rate refinance loan that you can afford.  Remember, the Making Home Affordable program expires on June 10, 2010.

QUESTION- What are the tax implications?

ANSWER- Charges for refinancing a mortgage are tax deductible. The total cost should be evenly divided to be deducted over the life of the mortgage, Inadomi said. Other costs, such as attorney or appraisal fees, are not deductible.You will also have to adjust your mortgage interest deduction if you get a lower interest rate.

QUESTION- Can I try to refinance or renegotiate my mortgage on my own, without going through the program?

ANSWER- Working directly with a lender shouldn’t be a problem if you think you’re not eligible for the federal program. Just beware of getting a third party involved, especially if they ask for an upfront fee.

Share

March 12, 2009

Predatory Lending and How the Home Mortgage Crisis Began

Was it predatory lending or was Wall Street and mortgage lenders simply rolling the dice too much?


Watch 60 Minutes/CBS News Interview on Predatory Mortgage Lending

Paul Bishop’s post “60 Minutes” interview on CBS Morning Show.  World Savings’ Paul Bishop spoke with Harry Smith about when he first noticed the company was taking on high risk home loans. 

Share

March 8, 2009

Obama Mortgage Refinance Highlights

For the mortgage refinance program, only homeowners whose loans are held by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac are eligible; they have until June 2010 to apply.  Consumers should contact their loan servicing company that sends out their monthly bill to find out if their mortgage liens are held by Fannie or Freddie. The two mortgage finance companies own or guarantee almost 31 million home mortgages more than half of all U.S. home mortgage loans.

 

Mortgage lenders can reduce a borrower’s interest rate to as low as 1% for 3 years, 2% for five years. Mortgage interest rates would then rise to about 5% until the mortgage is paid back.  If the loan workout plan works as proposed, it could be a big plus for borrowers like Nick Kavalary, a network cable installer who lives outside Milwaukee.  Kavalary, 42, has been struggling with JPMorgan Chase & Co. to get a loan modification. He was finally approved for one this year, but it only lowers his mortgage rate from 10.75%. to 9.8%.  Even at the lower mortgage rate, he said, making the loan payment is nearly impossible.  “If I can’t pick up a 2nd job, I’m going to lose this home,” he said. “With the job market being the way it is, nobody’s hiring anybody.”

 

Meanwhile, action to put in place another part of Obama’s housing plan is expected soon on Capitol Hill.  A few days ago, the House Democrats agreed to narrow proposed legislation that gives bankruptcy judges the power to change the terms of mortgage loans for borrowers distressed with debt.  The latest version of the mortgage relief bill would have the court’s judges considering whether a homeowner had been offered a reasonable loan by the bank to restructure his or her home loan before seeking help in bankruptcy court. Borrowers also would have a responsibility to document that they had previously attempted to renegotiate their home mortgage.

Share

January 6, 2009

Mortgage Giant Merger With Wells Fargo and Wachovia Complete

Wells Fargo & Co. announced Thursday the completion of its merger with Wachovia Corp., resulting in a monstrous distribution system for financial services with 1.4 trillion in assets and 11,000 stores nationwide servicing 48 million banking households and employing 276,000 employees.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHlcx9U3Yxs

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve approved the merger in mid-October following a debacle between Citigroup Inc. and Wells Fargo over which suitor would acquire Wachovia’s banking operations — Citi pulled out of talks after four days of discussion on splitting Wachovia’s assets.  Get the Mortgage News as it happens>

As of Thursday, customers of Wells Fargo and Wachovia were granted access to use all the company’s 12,260 combined automated teller machines.  Pat Callahan, an executive vice president and head of the Company’s merger transition, said Wachovia customers will continue to see the Wachovia brand in their banking stores and communities for the near future. “The key to a successful integration will be our ability to provide outstanding customer service throughout the integration,” said Callahan. “So we’re going to take our time and do this right. Wells Fargo and Wachovia customers should continue banking as they do today…”  Wells Fargo continues to be one the most respected mortgage lenders nationwide.

At closing, Wells Fargo acquired all outstanding shares of common stock of Wachovia in a stock-for-stock transaction. Wachovia shareholders received 0.1991 shares of Wells Fargo common stock in exchange for each share of Wachovia common stock they owned. Shares of each outstanding series of Wachovia preferred stock were converted into shares or fractional shares of a corresponding series Wells Fargo preferred stock, having substantially the same rights and preferences, Wells Fargo said in a press statement.  Read the Complete Bank Merger Article >

Share

January 5, 2009

Low Home Mortgage Rates Have Not Lured All New Homebuyers

In a recent article, Aleshia Howe considers the impact of low interest rates and the lack of home financing in recent weeks.  Mortgage lenders and consumers alike have watched home mortgage rates tumble to near mid-4 % range before quickly rising above than 5%. As home mortgage rates continue to flirt with 30-year lows, local mortgage lenders say they’re seeing a noticeable spike in refinancing inquiries, but the historic low rates have done little to convince “looky-lue” homebuyers to re-enter the market.

Is now a good time for New Homebuyers to Jump in Because Home Mortgage Rates are low?  httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOag1LIcZ4k

The volatility in the market is expected to hang around. However, with mortgage rates approaching record lows, applications for the week ended Dec. 26, 2008, ran 155% ahead of the mortgage activity seen during the same week in 2007, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s weekly survey.    Many mortgage lenders say the rise in applications coincided with another drop in mortgage rates, as the federal government’s efforts to throw a lifeline to the residential mortgage market begin to manifest.  FHA home loan rates remain low and most of the new home loan applications reflect some type of FHA loan product.

According to the MBA’s survey, rates on thirty-year fixed-rate mortgage loans averaged 5.03% last week, down from 5.04 % the previous week.  Mortgage refinancing applications for refinancing made up 82.9% of all applications filed for the week ending Dec. 26, 2008, while the share of applications for adjustable rate mortgages, or ARMs, averaged 0.8%.  Not unlike the refinance boom that occurred during the last economic downturn in 2003, local lenders say their phones are continuously ringing and home refinancing is on most borrower’ minds. The difference between 2003 and now, however, rests in the guidelines.  “Mortgage rates have gone down; they’re not the lowest they’ve ever been, but they are definitely the lowest they’ve been in a while. Of course, these days are tougher than in the old days because of what’s gone on in the past year or so,” said Bob Neville, lender at Franklin Financial Mortgage in Southlake and board member with the Dallas-Fort Worth Association of Mortgage Brokers, or DFWMBA. “Things have tightened up considerably and it’s a whole new ball game, but people with good credit and a little equity are able to get some very nice rates.”

Scott Burdette, managing director of the Dallas-Fort Worth offices of IRR–Residential Valuation Consultants, said his firm also has seen a drastic uptick in refinancing applications for local properties.  “You’ve got willing people, but not all are capable because of new rules,” he said. “But there’s a definite spike and that means at least people are trying to be smart and make sure they’re in the best situation they can be in.”  Read the complete home financing article >

 

Share

November 18, 2008

Mortgage Loan Disclosures Revised

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development released its first revision to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act in 30 years. The new form requires disclosure of yield spread premiums paid to mortgage brokers.  HUD claims the new loan disclosure revisions for a new standardized Good Faith Estimate that HUD estimates will save borrowers about $700.  “For the first time ever, HUD is requiring mortgage lenders and brokers to provide borrowers with an easy-to-read standard Good Faith Estimate that will clearly answer the key questions they have when applying for a mortgage loan,” HUD said.

The current financial crisis began with the collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in July. The dominant institutions in the American mortgage market, and among the most powerful institutions politically, became wards of the government in a matter of weeks. What was their fatal flaw?

One popular explanation, often advanced by the GSEs themselves, is their “affordable-housing goals.” In 1992, as part of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act, Congress required the GSEs to devote some of their home loan purchases to housing for families in the lower half of the income distribution, and also to families living in areas considered to be “underserved.” Housing for both homeowners and renters is included. Specific %age targets were set on a transition basis; the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development was required to revise the targets periodically, by regulation, which it has done 3 times (1996, 2001, and 2005).

The law requires HUD to set goals on the basis of the kinds of mortgage loans the GSEs actually buy — their market — and the importance of lower-income borrowers and underserved areas in that market. Research in the late 1990s showed that the GSEs were already buying the better-quality bad credit mortgages and also low-documentation loans (“Alt-A”), so the goals in 2001 and 2005 included these loans as part of their market.

The home financing goals will then be factored in as %ages of the mortgages the GSEs actually bought between 2001 and 2004, for example, out of every 100 loans they bought, 50 were supposed to be for homeowners and renters in the lower half of the income distribution. This may sound high, but in those years other mortgage lenders, making loans to similar types borrowers as the GSEs, made more than 57% of their loans to lower-income families. Effective in 2005, the goal was raised to 52%, with a further increase to 53% for 2006.

RESPA continues to promote affordable-housing goals, but is that realistic? They let the GSEs off the hook and shift the blame to the Bush administration, at the same time diverting attention from the refusal of congressional Democrats to allow stronger regulation of Fannie and Freddie after their accounting scandals surfaced in 2003. The goals are even blamed by some conservatives, who see them as credit allocation, and overlook the special privileges conferred on the GSEs by their federal charters which create something close to a federally sponsored duopoly in the mortgage financing market.

Share

November 3, 2008

FHA Loan Program Tough for Homeowners to Qualify for Refinancing

Category: FHA Mortgage,Mortgage Lender Discussion – admin – 4:46 pm

By now most people understand that we have a significant foreclosure crisis evolving. Hundreds of thousands of people each month are receiving a notice of default that is the first step of the foreclosure process.  The latest numbers from HUD are stunning: For the first 15 days of October only 49 homeowners with delinquent conventional loans were able to refinance with FHA home loans. That’s less than one per state.

Consider that the highly-anticipated new FHA loan program, Hope for Homeowners was going to cure the mortgage refinancing problems? HUD announced on October 2nd, “The Bush Administration today unveiled additional mortgage loan assistance for homeowners who may be at risk of foreclosure. The HOPE for Homeowners Program will refinance mortgages for borrowers who are having difficulty making their payments, but can afford a new FHA loan insured by HUD’s Federal Housing Administration.”

In fact, the Bush Administration was vehemently opposed to the legislation and just days before it passed was threatening to veto the FHA Loan Reform bill which included the Hope for Homeowners package.  But now FHA mortgage reform has become law. The mortgage law has been effective since July but very few borrowers were able to qualify FHA mortgage applicants. But this refinance program just doesn’t work well for delinquent borrowers because they typically have too many late payments.

HUD recently reports that for the first 15 days of October it had 42 home loan applications and they were unable to approve any of these applicants. Even though the FHA home loan program has a history of helping homeowners with bad credit, the Hope for Homeowner loan is providing very little hope for homeowners who are trying to prevent a foreclosure.

Share

October 11, 2008

Will McCain’s FHA Refinance Plan Help Mortgage Lenders?

Category: FHA Mortgage,Mortgage Lender Discussion – admin – 3:13 pm

Senator John McCain introduced a new plan during the second presidential candidates’ debate on Tuesday night that he believes will rescue the housing market and bolster the economy.  The McCain plan, dubbed the American Homeownership Resurgence Plan, would allow the Secretary of Treasury to buy up bad home mortgage loans, convert them into low-interest FHA-insured loans, and reset the loan principal (therefore decreasing monthly payments) based on a decrease in the value of the home.  The McCain camp thinks his plan will save homeowners from foreclosure.

The plan is aimed at helping those 1 in 6 Americans that are now upside down in their mortgages due, in part, to sinking home values.  McCain’s home financing plan would give these people a chance to refinance based on the current value of their home.  McCain’s plan would be paid for by U.S. taxpayers under funding that’s already been approved in the $700 billion bailout.  According to Scott Hess, former WMC executive, “Americans need a new alternative to refinancing, because sadly, most homeowners do not qualify to refinance their home because of tightened lending guidelines nobody anticipated.”  Hess continued, “At least with a loan modification, homeowners can restructure their mortgage with a fixed rate and a payment that they can afford.”

Opponents, say his proposal are unfair to homeowners who are paying their mortgage loans every month, and that it’s a bad financing decision.  Scott Messina, believes McCain’s plan is a place to begin, but it’s likely won’t solve the mortgage crisis. “It’s a step in the right direction because it attempts to address the issue of rising foreclosures,” said Messina.  “However, it’s important for market stability that those people who are paying their mortgages on time and don’t need a bailout are not penalized.”

“Where’s the incentive for homeowners on the brink to do the right thing?  If everyone else is getting a bail out with no repercussions, then why should you continue to struggle?” questioned Messina. Under Messina’s plan, the Congress would pass legislation that provides for a new FHA mortgage loan program, the 203S, or the 203 Save program that would be sold as Ginnie Mae securities just like many FHA loans are now and would carry the current guarantee by the U.S. Government.  All 203S mortgages would only offer fixed mortgage rates only available to homeowners currently facing foreclosure.

Foreclosure Prevention
Get assistance with a home mortgage modification the company that brings a proven track record.

Loan Modifications
Get your home loan modified by lawyers that can reduce your monthly mortgage payment.

FHA Mortgage Refinance
$175,000 Mortgage Loan Under $899 a month! Calculate the monthly savings and put more cash in your pocket money.

 

Share

April 29, 2008

State of Mortgage Brokering and Lending

I heard an awful report about Citi Mortgage freezing home equity credit lines.  A mortgage lender recently reported that one of his clients heloc was frozen without notice.  Here are the facts according to mortgage banker Bryan Dornan, “The borrower was a 781, full doc borrower under 40% DTI and under 75% CLTV.  The borrower lives in San Diego county and reported that they had always made their mortgage payment on time and they have even made a principal paydown on the credit line that paid off over $100,000 of the outstanding balance.” 

One day they received a letter in the mail that CITI was freezing their credit line effective immdiately.  The borrower had the option to appeal the decision and when they followed that path, they had to pay for a new URAR appraisal from an appraiser that Citi Mortgage selected.  I don’t know about you, but when a 780 fico, full doc borrower under 75% CLTV gets their credit line frozen, I start to wonder…  Is this the state of mortgage brokering and lending in 2008?   With banks freezing 2nd mortgages on borrowers like this I start to believe that the mortgage crisis has just begun.  Please share your recent lending stories.

Share

Switch to our mobile site